- #1642015Hero42MemberMember since: July 18, 2008
Replies: 10986Hero42 September 14, 2017 at 4:05 pm
Actually there are a lot of independent studies and reviews of peer reviewed articles that came up with that figure. If you have the courage to check you could start here for a quick summary:
In addition the peer reviewed papers were written by climate scientists and peer reviewed by climate scientists.
Your link has fourteen people and only one has any climate science credentials. But on closer inspection it turns out that Professor Tim Ball is misrepresenting himself.
Ball has spoken twice at The Heartland Institute’s International Conference on Climate Change, where he was presented as a former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. However, Ball was a professor of geography, not climatology, and that the University of Winnipeg has never had a climatology department.
Cheers 🙂#1642292TedE September 17, 2017 at 12:09 pm
Than you for the link hero42.
TedE - Papakura -#1642359TedE September 17, 2017 at 11:02 pm
I recommmnd this video:
TedE - Papakura -#1642389Squirter September 18, 2017 at 10:23 am
Marilyn Waring, what can one say….an extraordinary lady.
Cheers mate. 😀#1642390Squirter September 18, 2017 at 10:28 am
NASA, Bill Gates, Richard Branson, all for Geoengineering-chemtrails. Very interesting.
Cheers. 😀#1642391Squirter September 18, 2017 at 10:41 am
Connecting The Dots, and so it goes on.
[Part1 of 4] Chemtrails, Monsanto and Bill Gates : Connecting the Dots – YouTube
Cheers. 😀 with 3 more video’s to follow…..and Evelyn De Rothschilds owns his mown weather site too.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=evelyn+de+rothschild+chemtrails#1642449TedE September 18, 2017 at 2:42 pm
Thanks for those connections Squirter.
TedE - Papakura -#1642521TedE September 18, 2017 at 10:46 pm
What is possible:
TedE - Papakura -#1642675Squirter September 19, 2017 at 5:39 pm
I’ll have a look at that one too….Here’s Bill Gates No.2
Cheers mate.#1651379Hero42MemberMember since: July 18, 2008
Replies: 10986Hero42 November 9, 2017 at 4:04 pm
Winters are a month shorter than a century ago , Niwa research shows.
Principal climate scientist Brett Mullan has been looking at New Zealand temperature records going back to 1909 using data from seven geographically representative locations around the country.
Looking at two 30-year periods, 1909 to 1938 and 1987 to 2016, he calculated that winters have contracted by about one month.
If a threshold of 9°C was chosen there was an average of 100 days per year between 1909 and 1938 when the temperature was less than 9°C, compared to only 70 days per year between 1987 and 2016. Winter contracted about equally from both ends.
A shorter winter period affected the environment, plant growth and what you can grow and where.
“Plants can mature more quickly, you might be able to grow two crops when you could only grow one before or grow different things that require more heating.”
But there were downsides too, as higher temperatures allowed more pests and diseases.
And there were disadvantages for growers of crops like kiwifruit that require chilling in the winter for the fruit to set properly.
“That is why they have moved out of Northland, as it is not cold enough, and as time goes by they will have to move out of Bay of Plenty as well.”
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.