Login

Forgot password? Cart My cart (0 items)
Font size: A- A+
Become a Member FREE

Become a GrownUp and join our Community. Stay up to date with our weekly newsletter, discuss topics with other members, grab some great member-only offers and so much more.

Register Free Now!
Notices
Tell Friends & Family about GrownUps
Tell Friends & Family about GrownUps
Introduce others to a new world, online.
Join the Vitality Community!
Join the Vitality Community!
Our aim is to be your guide to living life to the full!
List your Classified
List your Classified
House Sitters, Employment, For Sale, Property & Personals
Chat with other Members
Chat with other Members
Click on the blue banner on the top right hand side of the page!
Compare & Purchase Insurance products
Disclaimer: GrownUps is not an Insurance Broker. We do not make recommendations on any financial services products. Always seek suitable advice.
R50 Sexual Health
R50 Sexual Health
Check out the new section available to everyone.
Recipes
Recipes
Find some delicious recipes by clicking here.

Vote in our Polls

Do you suffer from any muscle or joint aches and pains?

Category sponsor

10741-littl_e_jack_2 18 Aug 2012 8:57pm #1
offline Old Jack

Member since 19 Dec 2006

Member from Hampden

Posts: 6355

Gidday

Now they have started with this, just like I warned ages ago, how long will it take before they start at the other end of life? Like if you are over a cetaing age and start needing too much medication you will get an after-birth abortion.

"Abstract

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call â??after-birth abortionâ?? (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled. "

http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/01/medethics-2011-100411.full

9005-joy_child 18 Aug 2012 10:22pm #2
online Joybel

Member since 02 Nov 2006

Member from Linwood

Posts: 26190

My Scottish uncle and his wife came to stay with us. I was 15. He had spent three years in a Japanese war camp. The things he related were horrible. I heard he and my mother talking about their childhood in Scotland. he made the remark that there were no cripples or mentally and physically handicapped children in their town, because the midwives took care of them. This was a common happening it seems as life was hard enough being pregnant year after year without a handicapped infant to care for.

I believe that today when a baby is born with spina bifida it is wrapped up as usual but left untreated to see if it can survive as is. So it is not new just not talked about.

3582-avatar_1_copy 19 Aug 2012 12:07pm #3
offline Belladonna

Member since 29 Jun 2006

Member from Shirley

Posts: 6892

#1


I remember this from a while ago;it was only ever intended as a hypothetical & ethical discussion & was NOT advocating this at all.

But naturally,once the media got hold of it they sensationalised it & people who did not understand the hypothetical nature of the discussion then actually believed that it was being advocated;there was a huge outcry at the time & the idea under discussion was universally condemned.
So much for discussion.

23757-Annie_in_the_Sink 19 Aug 2012 6:03pm #4
online gaye-belle

Member since 28 May 2008

Member from Wrights Bush

Posts: 7257

Animals leave the weak behind to die, to preserve a healthy species.wink

10741-littl_e_jack_2 19 Aug 2012 11:08pm #5
offline Old Jack

Member since 19 Dec 2006

Member from Hampden

Posts: 6355

Gidday

Why on earth would anyone bring up any subject as an hypothetical & ethical discussion unless they were intending to make it into a policy?

When this becomes law, like everything that the extreme left anti-christ pushers are intending to do they will then put up a new subject as an hypothetical & ethical discussion, when a person costs more to keep alive than he or she actually contributes to society, ie. the elderly, it is only logic they should get after-birth aborted.

23757-Annie_in_the_Sink 19 Aug 2012 11:24pm #6
online gaye-belle

Member since 28 May 2008

Member from Wrights Bush

Posts: 7257

Would that apply to the 'Born Again Christians' OJ?

Are we not supposed to live for 3 score and 10, is that from the bible? So that sounds like our life limit. Anything after that is a bonus. wink

Blank 20 Aug 2012 10:26am #7
offline Hero42

Member since 18 Jul 2008

Member from Porirua

Posts: 5024

Old Jack
But we have right wing government that cares for people so surely this isn't going to happen.

Cheers biggrin

3582-avatar_1_copy 20 Aug 2012 10:53am #8
offline Belladonna

Member since 29 Jun 2006

Member from Shirley

Posts: 6892

'Why on earth would anyone bring up any subject as an hypothetical & ethical discussion unless they were intending to make it into a policy?'


People discuss things all the time which are hypothetical OJ;its not unusual at all,especially in academic,scientific & philosophical circles.


'When this becomes law, like everything that the extreme left anti-christ pushers are intending to do they will then put up a new subject as an hypothetical & ethical discussion, when a person costs more to keep alive than he or she actually contributes to society, ie. the elderly, it is only logic they should get after-birth aborted.'



As I said,this was n_e_v_e_r intended as anything other than a hypothetical discussion.
Unfortunately,once the American right wing christian brigade got hold of the story,common sense flew out the window.eek



On more than one occasion,I've discussed with others the possibility pf exporting our duly elected plonkers to somewhere overseas;Siberia being a favoured destination.
That does not mean however,that even if it was within my power to do so, I would do it - because the discussion was hypothetical.

10379-onsantasknee 20 Aug 2012 10:40pm #9
online Chris21-4

Member since 09 Dec 2006

Member from Te Awamutu

Posts: 3507

Ah, but maybe we can in time implement that into law Belladonna.

3582-avatar_1_copy 21 Aug 2012 12:13pm #10
offline Belladonna

Member since 29 Jun 2006

Member from Shirley

Posts: 6892

'Ah, but maybe we can in time implement that into law Belladonna.'


Hmm...since so many of us (well...ok two of us!) are keen Chris,perhaps we should look into doing it?!rolleyesmrgreen

NOW'S good...mrgreen

10379-onsantasknee 21 Aug 2012 1:00pm #11
online Chris21-4

Member since 09 Dec 2006

Member from Te Awamutu

Posts: 3507

Can we introduce that as, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, maybe a Taxpayer's Private Bill. ?
We would have to have a referendum wouldn't we.


print


Enter GrownUps CompetitionsJoin our Chat RoomFind Friends on GrownUpsCoast FM

site links