- #1707120farmer008MemberMember since: August 10, 2012
Replies: 157farmer008 January 9, 2019 at 8:11 am
The liberal view of hate speech is anything that is critical of the liberal leftie point of view.
The rise of the Right in Britain which is pro Brexit anti immigrant and in Europe which is also anti immigrant is a reaction to the liberal agenda that is determined to destroy western values.
One right wing Hungarian, in a speech stated that all immigrants should be placed in internment camps along with every liberal already identified
The future of our western freedoms are at stake .
About time the UN and liberal politicians verbally attacked the leadership of African and other nations who are pushing their citizens into the sea.
Two of the worlds wealthiest countries are two of the most despotic with their treatment of their poor, they are Nigeria and Venezuela.
Where is the liberal point of view on the European fence anti immigrant fences already built and where is the liberal on the 600 mile wall that Obama built
Hopefully Trump gets his wall and Britain exits the EU and takes control of its borders and that European nations rid themselves of this EU lot and replace it with something that puts European values to the fore.
The Ozzies have the right idea , Deport anyone who does not adopt Australian ideals#1707129huiatahiMemberMember since: March 22, 2017
Replies: 878huiatahi January 9, 2019 at 9:05 am
The Ozzies have the right idea , Deport anyone who does not adopt Australian ideals
If New Zealand did the same thing here I think you might be on a fast boat to somewhere else farmer
huiatahi#1707131farmer008MemberMember since: August 10, 2012
Replies: 157farmer008 January 9, 2019 at 9:12 am
Would you deport every New Zealand born citizen who opposed your views
That is a Racist comment from a simple mind.#1707133huiatahiMemberMember since: March 22, 2017
Replies: 878huiatahi January 9, 2019 at 9:28 am
No…but Id deport those who consistently breached the Race Relations Act
huiatahi#1707138BryanMemberMember since: October 28, 2006
Replies: 12391Bryan January 9, 2019 at 10:36 am
I think you are comparing Apples with Pairs.
When you refer to subsidence on the runup to the tanker wash at Whareroa You are referring to on site activity that I would suspect was never prepared to carry the weight of a full tanker
No way can this reflect as an example of truck damage to roads
Good morning. The subsidence I refer to in the run up to the tanker wash “was” prepared to SH1 standard in the first place. Perhaps a better reference point would be the intersection of SH3 and Whareroa Road. I haven’t been down there for some good time but when I was driving it was in a constant state of repair. Of course part of the problem at that corner can be attributed to scuffing caused by turning dual axles although they also happens with logging trucks on normal roads. Talking of dual axles I wonder how much worse tri axels go for extra ware and tare.
At Home, At Peace and Causing Trouble In South Taranaki#1707140paulinemMemberMember since: July 8, 2006
Replies: 814paulinem January 9, 2019 at 11:19 am
Farmer on ANZAC day we gather together and commemorate those that gave their lives, so that NZ would remain a DEMOCRATIC FREE society. A society where the citizens are entitled to freely express and to have their own spiritual and political viewpoint. Yes Farmer this means be allowed even to publicly express a view point that is different to your own.
What you have posted above grossly insults the memory and service these brave NZers whom gave their lives just to assure we would remain a free democratic country (and not controlled by selfish self serving ego driven people like Trump) for our future generations.#1707142lilith7MemberMember since: April 9, 2017
Replies: 1956lilith7 January 9, 2019 at 11:29 am
- abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.“we don’t tolerate any form of hate speech”
NZ Law society definition:
It shall be unlawful for any person—
to publish or distribute written matter which is threatening, abusive, or insulting, or to broadcast by means of radio or television or other electronic communication words which are threatening, abusive, or insulting; or
to use in any public place as defined in section 2(1) of the Summary Offences Act 1981, or within the hearing of persons in any such public place, or at any meeting to which the public are invited or have access, words which are threatening, abusive, or insulting; or
to use in any place words which are threatening, abusive, or insulting if the person using the words knew or ought to have known that the words were reasonably likely to be published in a newspaper, magazine, or periodical or broadcast by means of radio or television,—
being matter or words likely to excite hostility against or bring into contempt any group of persons in or who may be coming to New Zealand on the ground of the colour, race, or ethnic or national origins of that group of persons.
It shall not be a breach of subsection (1) to publish in a newspaper, magazine, or periodical or broadcast by means of radio or television or other electronic communication a report relating to the publication or distribution of matter by any person or the broadcast or use of words by any person, if the report of the matter or words accurately conveys the intention of the person who published or distributed the matter or broadcast or used the words.
For the purposes of this section,—
newspaper means a paper containing public news or observations on public news, or consisting wholly or mainly of advertisements, being a newspaper that is published periodically at intervals not exceeding 3 months
publishes or distributes means publishes or distributes to the public at large or to any member or members of the public
written matter includes any writing, sign, visible representation, or sound recording.”
Not a damned thing to do with what liberals see as hate speech,but rather,something which applies to everyone.
I’ve had posts removed too, & as there was never anything offensive or insulting,its difficult to tell if its just a glitch of some sort or if,for reasons best known to themselves,admin removed them.
Perhaps someone objects to the use of the word troll?
#1707146doogieMemberMember since: March 27, 2006
- This reply was modified 3 months, 1 week ago by lilith7. Reason: MORE gobbledegook!
Replies: 6294doogie January 9, 2019 at 12:03 pm
I agree Brian, scuffing on tight turns at intersections by a laden trucks can be damaging.#1707302AnonymousMember since:
Replies: 415Anonymous January 10, 2019 at 12:01 pm
Hi Bry, Doogie – with reference to bitumen/asphalt – a lot determines on what time of the year it is applied on how good it will adhere to the roads/drives etc. That is why, when potholes in the road filled in during winter don’t last long. Most private paving companies leave in late Autumn and go to Florida for the winter around here. The townships will fill in an obvious driving hazard only during the winter. Do your road works keep paving all year?#1707320arandarMemberMember since: November 23, 2009
Replies: 10629arandar January 10, 2019 at 1:56 pm
Mommabear, good question.
I was very imprecise and loose with that definition. I suppose I was short cutting to one part of that particular human right that is important to me – the right of citizens to criticise their government without fear of being incarcerated without trial or disappeared – as an ex-journalist.
Under S19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we all have the right to express our opinions.
It is not an unlimited right nor is it a right that, if misused, does not have consequences.
This may help to clarify – from Wikipedia but generally accepted as being correct and true.
“Freedom of speech and expression, therefore, may not be recognized as being absolute, and common limitations or boundaries to freedom of speech relate to libel, slander, obscenity, pornography, sedition, incitement, fighting words, classified information, copyright violation, trade secrets, food labeling, non-disclosure agreements, the right to privacy, the right to be forgotten, public security, and perjury. Justifications for such include the harm principle, proposed by John Stuart Mill in On Liberty, which suggests that: “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.”
And I totally support that final sentence from John Stuart Mill.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.