This article is part of the Health & Wellbeing topic. Below are more articles in this topic.
This article has been submitted by a GrownUps member. GrownUps accepts no liability for its content and the views and information contained within are not necessarily those of the GrownUps website.
Recent publicity in the media on the danger of calcium supplementation increasing the likelihood of a heart attack or stroke has confused many consumers. Especially in New Zealand where originated. The publicity arose from a series of meta analyses carried out by Prof Ian Reid at Auckland University, the results being published in the British Medical Journal in early 2011. For these meta analyses he has chosen a wide range of trials covering some 29,000 people and states for every 1,000 people taking calcium supplements we save 3 fractures and cause 6 heart attacks.
While he is not sure of the reason, he postulates that when a consumer starts taking a conventional calcium supplement in a large dose it causes an abrupt spike in the blood serum calcium and this causes the increased risk. His recommendation is to take any calcium supplementation in the form of food rather than concentrated in a capsule of inorganic calcium. That is increase the intake of such high calcium foods such as dairy products. If you must take a supplement take one that is in a complex organic form such as found in food, take it with a meal and split your daily dose rate.
Prof Reid's views are challenged by a number of people. The Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), the Woman's Health Initiative (WHI), health supplement organisations and a number of well known heart specialists all express concern at the figures. They say that Prof Reid has just selected trials that proved his thesis and left out those that did not fit and they say he poses more questions than answers. There are many more trials that show no heart effects than the ones he has selected and none of the trials were designed to measure effects on the heart. The effect of Vitamin D in a calcium supplement was not given full recognition
Their comments may be correct, and mega analyses can often give strange results. For example world meta analyses of dairy product consumption and osteoporosis rates show clearly an inverse ratio. Often countries with high dairy product consumption have much higher rates of osteoporosis than those with low dairy product consumption. Still Prof Reid is a very reputable researcher and I am sure he honestly believes in his theory. It would seem foolish not to keep this matter under review and in the meantime follow Prof Reid's advice if taking calcium supplements (generally he prefers calcium to be taken in the diet in a natural form with other minerals and nutrients).
However he says if you do need a calcium supplement make your choice an insoluble one, preferably a complex organic one that contains a range of minerals and proteins and is akin to a concentrated food. Take this with meals and split the daily dose.
The calcium supplement NUZEACAL developed and patented here in New Zealand fits these criteria well with its calcium being held in the desirable MCHA form and it has the additional benefit of containing a powerful bioactive protein/ collagen 2 complex that increases bone strength. Also some of the calcium supplements derived from sea algae are more complex and contain a wide range of minerals as well.